Trinitarian formula - Creedopedia
About us  |  Why use us?  |  Press  |  Contact us

Topic: Trinitarian formula


  
 Trinity - God, Father, Son, Holy Spirit - Trinitarian, Tritheism, Triadic - Three Persons - Godhead
While the term trinity does not appear in Scripture, the trinitarian structure appears throughout the New Testament to affirm that God Himself is manifested through Jesus Christ by means of the Spirit.
This passage is the clearest scriptural reference to a systematic presentation of the doctrine of the Trinity.
The fourth category of trinitarian passages includes those presented in the farewell discourse of Jesus to His disciples (John 14:16; 15:26; 16:13-15).
http://www.thewordsofeternallife.com/trinity.html   (1745 words)

  
 Mathew 28:19 Fraud Exposed
Trinitarians hid the knowledge of this Hebrew Gospel from the Oneness Apostolics.
This Baptist false doctrine was developed when their scholars discovered the trinity baptismal formula was not in the original Hebrew Gospel of Matthew.
Interesting that a false doctrine could be birthed based upon what is not in the Bible, rather then what is in the Bible.
http://jesus-messiah.com/apologetics/catholic/matthew-proof.html   (819 words)

  
 FOR THE TELEVISED DISCUSSION ON TRINITARIAN THEOLOGY
Regarding Buddhism: again, many Christian scholars find "hints of the trinity" in its teachings: e.g., the formula of the triratna, the teaching of the "three bodies" of Buddha, the theory of the "three ages" of salvation in Mahayana Buddhism, and some Buddhist psychological triads (three principles) in Buddhist spirituality.
Thus the primary concern of Asian theologians in the realm of trinitarian doctrine and theology would be to proclaim this central mystery of our faith within our Asian context, so deeply marked as it is by the great religious traditions of the East: Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism.
In Islam we encounter a wholly unconditional "yes" to the one and only God who is Allah, an absolute and militant "no" to the Christian Trinity.
http://www.clerus.org/clerus/dati/2002-01/29-999999/02TriING.html   (1637 words)

  
 Questions On Baptism
We know from early Church writings that the Trinitarian formula was used from most ancient times, and the doctrine was accepted as the correct interpretation of scripture by the world-wide Church at several Ecumneical Councils.
Catholics believe that all people who have received water baptism in the Trinitarian formula are mysteriously united to the Church, and indwelt with the grace of Jesus Christ.
Thus, Catholics believe that the Trinitarian formula is revealed through Scripture and Sacred Tradition to be a if not the correct way to do baptism.
http://baptizeme.blogspot.com   (2928 words)

  
 Theology Today - Vol 49, No.4 - January 1993 - CRITICS CORNER - In Whose Name? Feminism and the Trinitarian Baptismal ...
Rather, we have in the formula, "Father, Son, and Holy Spirit," a "theological shorthand" for the entire Christian faith that arises from the New Testament traditions concerning Jesus of Nazareth.
This is not to say that, as a governing doctrine, the Trinity excludes extra-biblical language for God, (as witness the very term "Trinity"), or, contrariwise, that all theistic predications are, in principle, restricted to those of the Bible.
Moreover, only a thoroughgoing biblicism would exclude a trinitarian interpretation or liturgical use of texts that in their original setting were interpreted or used otherwise.
http://theologytoday.ptsem.edu/jan1993/v49-4-criticscorner1.htm   (3546 words)

  
 [No title]
Although trinitarianism was not in elaborate theological formulas in the first century, the New Testament and the primitive church did believe and teach it.
Christian trinitarianism does not find its origin in pagan triads, but in Christian wrestlings with revelation.60 The early church then, as the orthodox church today, understood the presence of the humanity of Christ, but at the same time lauded his divinity.
Trinitarian heresy caught on and became the cornerstone of the Christian faith only by many ungodly turns of events.
http://www.mscomm.com/~messiah7/rvw_3in1.htm   (5726 words)

  
 Trinitarian formula - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The trinitarian formula is the phrase "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit", or words to that form and effect referring to the persons of the Holy Trinity.
These words are quoted in literal conformity to a command of Jesus according to the Bible, commonly called the great commission of Matthew 28:19: " Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in [or into] the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit."
From the late twentieth century onwards, many Christians have become uncomfortable with the traditionally male representation of God and have sought to de-emphasise or eliminate altogether gender-specific references to God.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinitarian_formula   (299 words)

  
 Sermons from Seattle - Sermons - Series C
We conclude with the Trinitarian benediction: “May the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all, on this day and forevermore.
That is, all traditional worship services in all mainline denominations begin with the Trinitarian formula.
Similarly, all worship services in the mainline denominations conclude with the same ancient formula, “In the name of the Father and on the Son and of the Holy Spirit.
http://www.sermonsfromseattle.com/series_c_the_trinity.htm   (4838 words)

  
 The Doctrinal Exclusion: Trinity and the Nature of God
Since both LDS Christians and orthodox Christians affirm the doctrines of the incarnation and bodily resurrection of God the Son, then in the person of the Son, God must be understood to have a tangible body.
The formula allowed orthodoxy to affirm with the New Testament that Christ suffered while agreeing with Plato that God is impassible.
Most modern Christians are unaware of the doctrine at all and naively talk about a God who suffers, but those who are conversant with the fine points of orthodoxy know that according to the fourth- and fifth-century church fathers, the divine nature within Christ could not and did not suffer for us or anyone else.
http://www.lightplanet.com/mormons/response/general/christians/ser7.htm   (6754 words)

  
 BiblicalUnitarian.com - 47 Reasons why our Heavenly Father has no equals or co-equals
It was Trinitarian scribes who tried to have this phrase taken from the Bible because it disagreed with their theology and they could not explain it.] Even after his resurrection, Jesus still receives knowledge from God as Rev. 1:1 indicates: “The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him.”
Yet there is no Trinitarian formula in the Bible and Trinitarians themselves cannot agree on a definition.
Thankfully, even modern Trinitarian scholars recognize that the original reading was genesis, although it is translated as “birth” in almost all translations.
http://www.biblicalunitarian.com/html/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=140   (3845 words)

  
 Hans Kosmala
On the other hand it must be stated at once that the faith in God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, as it found expression later in the Creed of the Church has its roots in the New Testament 10).
The gospels were written as straightforward records of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus with the ensuing charge to the disciples to bring Christ's message to all the nations.
Neither did it express the faith of the Church of God, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
http://www.godglorified.com/kosmala.htm   (6717 words)

  
 Authorized Version Defense The Johannine Comma, 1 John 5:7 & AV1611 Code
The Trinitarian formula, “the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost" is distinctly exclusive for the Apostle John but the formula "the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost" is quite common for all other New Testament writers.
The usual formula, "the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost" would have been most assuredly used by a forger instead in 1 John 5:7.
We maintain that the King James Bible is perfect, pure, inerrant, and infallible not only in its thoughts and meaning but also in the structure of its words, letters, vowels, and consonants.
http://www.kjv-asia.com/authorized_version_defense_the_johannine_comma__1_john_5_7___av1611_code.htm   (1057 words)

  
 What Is Written 7-Feb-99: A Baptismal Formula
Therefore, they think that when their preachers recite their preordained formula “in the name of the Lord Jesus” that they are giving the name of the father and the son and the Holy Spirit.
He says that you cannot use that formula for it is a Catholic Church error.
I know it and so do these men and women who claim that there is one given in the scriptures.
http://www.traderspointchurch.org/articles/wiw990207.html   (3323 words)

  
 Baptismal Formula in Scripture and History
Its baptismal formula was "in the name of Jesus Christ" or "Lord Jesus," not "in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost".
We are to fulfill the command of that verse as the early church did, by invoking the name of Jesus at baptism.
Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics (1951), II, 384, 389: "The formula used was "in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ" or some synonymous phrase; there is no evidence for the use of the trine name.
http://www.leesvilleupc.org/Blfs_Baptism.htm   (896 words)

  
 "Must baptism be "in Jesus' name"?"
Oneness Pentecostal theology maintains that baptism must be by immersion using the formula "in Jesus name" and not the formula "in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit" as is found in Matt.
To support their method, they cite various Bible verses that reference baptizing in Jesus' name and claim that this is proof for their doctrine.
Acts 19:5, "When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
http://www.carm.org/oneness/inJesusname.htm   (560 words)

  
 Trinitarian Baptism and Matthew 28
A number of observations from Bible-based sources reveal that the Trinitarian formula is an erroneous teaching of the Church, a doctrine that eventually crept into the evangel of Matthew.
It is not said into the names of, etc., nor into the name of the Father, and the name of the son, and the name of the Holy Ghost -- Hence might be deduced the idea of a Trinity constituting at the same time a Divine Unity.
The Interpreter’s Bible agrees: “Probably this baptismal formula was simpler in the very first days of the church -- ‘in the name of the [Master Yahshua].’ The formula of verse 19 was probably a later development,” vol.
http://www.ynca.com/trinitarian_baptism_and_matthew_.htm   (3524 words)

  
 Various Quotes
(2) The Trinitarian formula is foreign to the mouth of Jesus and has not the authority of the Apostolic age which it must have had if it had descended from Jesus himself.
It must be acknowledged that the formula of the threefold name, which is here enjoined, does not appear to have been employed by the primitive Church, which, so far as our information goes, baptized 'in' or 'into the name of Jesus' (or 'Jesus Christ' or Lord Jesus': Acts 2:38, 8:16, 10:48, 19:5, 1 Cor.
More typically, it is maintained that the one apostolic formula is 'in the name of Jesus,' and the account in Matthew was interpreted by the apostles, including Matthew himself, to be the invocation of the name of Jesus."
http://www.godglorified.com/various_quotes.htm   (1733 words)

  
 [No title]
On the other hand, since by AD 150 other Catholics were using texts of Matthew which possessed the trinitarian formula (as we saw, for instance, from The Didache), it clearly had been added very early in the second century, though it was probably not in the original autograph of the first gospel.
What is particularly interesting about this formula, however, is that as late as the beginning of the fourth century, the first historian of Catholic Christianity and the most learned Christian of his day, Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea, most frequently quoted Matthew 28:19 without the trinitarian formula.
A significant fact about this trinitarian summary is that it does not begin with God but rather with the Lord Jesus Christ, putting God in the second place.
http://www.central.edu/homepages/kopecekt/mct2.html   (10956 words)

  
 Trinitarian Worship
Trinitarian worship is not about our response to God.
While the word "trinity" appears nowhere in the Bible, a basic trinitarian formula of Father, Son and Holy Spirit is found in several places, including Matt.
A trinitarian worship definition continues to see worship as dialogue with God -- but it goes further than that.
http://www.covchurch.org/cov/resources/greenhouse/articles/trinitarianworship.html   (3727 words)

  
 :: ELCA :: synodical relations - conference of bishops > actions and pastoral letters . CB91.03.17
The Gospel promises that in Baptism we are graciously united by the Spirit into the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, with whom we too may then address God confidently as "our Father." This view fulfills the apostolic understanding of our risen Lord's commission for the Church to practice a Trinitarian Baptism in Matthew 28.
This intentional practice can also serve well to condemn any alleged Trinitarian sanction for sinful inequality or oppression of women in church and society.
All language issues in the life of this church cannot be resolved easily or quickly.
http://www.elca.org/sr/bishopstrinitarian.html   (720 words)

  
 Go ye, and make disciples of all nations in my name
The word trinity or its formula was not present in the original manuscripts of the Bible.
The Encyclopedia of Religion And Ethics states that Mt 28:19 "is the central piece of evidence for the traditional view [trinitarian formula].
It is clear, therefore, that [of all] the MSS which Eusebius inherited from his predecessor, Pamphilus, at Caesarea in Palestine, some at least preserved the original writing, in which there was no mention either of [both] baptism or of the words 'Father, Son, and Holy Ghost' [in Matthew 28:19]” (Hibbert Journal, 1902).
http://www.geocities.com/fdocc3/in-my-name.htm   (4420 words)

  
 Torah (Teachings) of Yahshua Messiah (Jesus, Yeshua) - rebuking the Trinity and Lawlessness
(Although the Trinitarian formula is now found in the modern-day book of Matthew), this does not guarantee its source in the historical teaching of Jesus.
It has also been pointed out that the idea of making disciples is continued in teaching them, so that the intervening reference to baptism with its Trinitarian formula was perhaps a later insertion into the saying.
Had Christ given such a command, it is urged, the Apostolic Church would have followed him, and we should have some trace of this obedience in the New Testament.
http://www.torahofmessiah.com/morematthew28.htm   (2285 words)

  
 LM
The celebrant was to dip the child "discreetly and warily." Infant baptism was typical in the Anglican Church at that time.
307) that the celebrant or an assisting priest or deacon shall immerse or pour water upon each candidate and say the trinitarian formula of baptism.
In practice, most Episcopal churches baptize by pouring (affusion).
http://www.episcopalchurch.org/19625_14547_ENG_Print.html   (475 words)

  
 I appreciate your patience
Trinitarian doctrine can and does exist in various 'flavors,' but none of them are compatible with subordinationism, at least as Trinitarian dogma has been expressed by the decrees and creeds of the orthodox councils throughout the centuries.
And I have only briefly noted that the elements of trinitarianism existed from the beginnings of Christianity, as did the core elements of "Church" and "Eucharist." The doctrine of the Trinity was a development from those early elements, and an elemental trinitarian or binitarian belief existed from the earliest days of the Church.
The Roman Catholic Church's position would probably be that a Christian must be one baptized using the trinitarian formula by a person with the proper intent (which is to do what the Church does when she baptizes).
http://www.allwest.net/~llee/storage/Kent_Stallard.htm   (16878 words)

  
 Baptism (lutheran Doctrine) (International Standard Bible Encyclopedia) :: Bible Tools
This ancient baptismal formula represents "the Father as the Originator, the Son as the Mediator, the Holy Ghost as the Realization, and the vital and vitalizing blessing of the promise and fulfillment," which is extended to men in this ordinance (Cremer).
For, throughout this period Christ promises His cooperative presence with the efforts of His disciples to make disciples.
This difficulty was considered by the Fathers; Ambrose says: Quod verbo tacitum fuerat, expressum est fide, "What had not been expressed in word, was expressed by faith." On close inspection the difficulty is found to rest on the assumption that the above are records of baptismal formulas used on those occasions.
http://bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Def.show/RTD/ISBE/ID/1147   (3126 words)

  
 Chapter 10
However, in 1919 the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada renounced Oneness, accepted trinitarianism, and affiliated with the Assemblies of God.
(This explanation admits that the original formula actually was "in the name of Jesus.") (2) The phrase "in the name of Jesus" was not meant to be a formula, but only signified that the baptized ones acknowledged Jesus as Lord and Christ.
Finally, in 1916 it rejected the Jesus Name formula, requiring all to accept use of the titles of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/pentecostal/New-Ch10.htm   (4302 words)

  
 The Watchman Expositor: Oneness Pentecostalism Profile
The AG debated the issue of baptism in Jesus' name at their 1915 general assembly, and in 1916 defeated the movement in their denomination by requiring adherence to Trinitarian theology in the Statement of Fundamental Truths.
The passage from Matthew is fulfilled because Jesus, the Son, is simply the ultimate expression of the monotheistic God (rather than the Son being a distinct Person within the Trinitarian Godhead).
The culmination of the meeting occurred when Canadian revivalist R.E. McAlister baptized converts not according to the Trinitarian formula of the historic Christian Church, but in the name of Jesus only.
http://www.watchman.org/profile/onenesspro.htm   (2547 words)

  
 The list below gives some additional information on Baptism in various denominations and religions
Formula is given as personal confession of belief in Jesus Christ.
Trinitarian form is not used, baptized only in the name of Jesus Christ using form found in Acts of the Apostles not St. Matthew
CHURCH OF GOD Baptism is conferred later in life in Trinitarian form when it is asked for.
http://www.diocesephoenix.org/catecheticalministry/Sacraments/valid2.htm   (442 words)

  
 Praising the Triune God: Beyond Gender?
He also points out that using the formula "Creator, Christ, and Spirit" risks the misunderstanding that Christ and Spirit are creatures (since the traditional formula functioned to speak of the interrelations of the persons as well as their relation to creation).
The question that provoked trinitarian thought in the first place is certainly the most important question to address in relation to this book.
Liturgical use of "Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and the Holy Ghost," and "I baptize you in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" became more rigid and formulaic in various regions as a result of theological debates.
http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=314   (3143 words)

  
 Friends of the Nazarene - De Trinitatis Erroribus - The Error of the Trinity - Part 3
Not, of course, by scholars, even Trinitarian ones, for obviously the Third Person is absent.
Despite what learned scholars have said on this subject of the divinity of Christ -- both pro and con -- many Trinitarians insist there are as many as 600 "proof texts" regarding the deity of Jesus.
This text is sometimes used in an effort to prove Jesus is God Himself because they assert that here the Nazarene foretells he will resurrect himself.
http://www.nazarene-friends.org/pubs/trinity/trinity3.html   (6484 words)

  
 Baptism
In the pursuit of appropriate language for describing the deity within the context of recent Biblical studies and interpretation, some Christian churches and congregations are experimenting with the Trinitarian formula in non-traditional terms (I.e.
We recognize there are communities that baptize at any age and others who insist upon baptizing only those able to make a profession of faith themselves.
Saint Matthew records that the risen Lord, when sending his disciples into the world, commanded them to baptize (Matthew 28:18-20." (BEM, page 2, paragraph 1)
http://www.masscouncilofchurches.org/docs/MCCUbaptism.htm   (1931 words)

  
 New Page 1
The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son and Holy Ghost by the Catholic Church in the Second Century.
The early church always baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus until development of the Trinity Doctrine in the Second Century.
These are some of the last words that Jesus told His disciples before He ascended.
http://www.vendelk.com/baptism%20in.htm   (1499 words)

  
 Mormons and Baptism
The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith's response is based on research requested by the U.S. bishops.
It would appear that regarding form and matter of the sacrament, there is little doubt that baptism as practiced by the members of the Mormon cult resembles baptism as celebrated in the Catholic Church and in certain Protestant ecclesial communities.
It is for the second reason that Mormons who convert to Catholicism are re-baptized.
http://www.bringyou.to/apologetics/a37.htm   (1658 words)

  
 Untitled
Both Oneness and Trinitarian teachers accept the verse in light of their understanding of the general tenor of Scripture.
Oneness people see no Trinitarian formula here but a truth that was revealed in the carrying out of the command by the Apostles in baptizing in the name of
Tertullian said: 'AND IT IS NOT ONLY ONCE, BUT THRICE, THAT WE ARE IMMERSED INTO THE THREE PERSONS, ONCE AT EACH SEVERAL MENTION OF THEIR NAMES.' The church gave INJUNCTIONS TO USE THE LONGER FORMULA, AND PUNISHMENT INCLUDING DEPOSITION, THREATENED THOSE WHO PRESUMED TO USE THE SHORTER.
http://www.altupc.com/articles/PART11.HTM   (1201 words)

  
 Baptism in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit
Baptism according to the instruction of the risen Lord in Matthew 28:19--baptism in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit--has become a matter of contention in some parts of the Christian Church, including the United Church of Christ.
Furthermore, as I hope this section on trinitarian theology makes clear, the traditional formula not only names God, it also provides a succinct summary of the heart of Christian faith and the whole of that faith.
Is a church that rejects the traditional baptismal formula still part of the one holy catholic church?
http://faithmilwaukee.org/olmsted.htm   (3443 words)

  
 PFRS Oneness Pentecostal & Baptism Issues
However, being baptized in Jesus' name was only necessary for the Jews and Samaritans who were already Monotheists, and who had a prior covenant with God.
This is a very ancient witness to Trinitarian beliefs as well.
However, there is no mistaking the three separate "pourings" mentioned in the latter part, one for each member of the Trinity.
http://www.pfrs.org/oneness/op05.html   (1279 words)

  
 Editorial - July/August 2005
This manifestation is expressed in the formula of ‘the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit’ (Matt.
This usage implies the unity of the Three divine Persons in the Trinity.&; In the Annotated Bible, J.H. Blunt comments: “The use of the word ‘Name’ in the singular number for the Three Persons of the Holy Trinity is one of the many indications given in Scripture of their Divine Unity.&;
And writing for the International Standard Bible Encycylopaedia, on “Trinity,&; Benjamin Warfield has extensive comments on this passage:
http://tidings.org/editorials/editor200507-08.htm   (968 words)

  
 Re: my question is what is the History of Baptism -- UNITED APOSTOLIC BIBLE TALK
From the same source, >page 378, "The use of the trinitarian formula of any >sort was not suggested in the early Church's history".
In addition, >Hastings Encyclopedia of Religions, vol 2, page 377 >states "Christian baptism was administered using the >words "In the name of Jesus".
Christ to the words Father, Son and Holy Ghost by the
http://www.voy.com/7989/17.html   (452 words)

  
 The Sacrament of Baptism
The essential part of the baptismal rite consists of pouring water over the head and saying the Trinitarian formula: 'I baptise you, in the name of the Father, and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.' The usual minister of Baptism is the priest or deacon, but anyone can baptise in an emergency.
The celebrant then baptised them, putting his hand on their head and plunging them into the water three times, saying the Trinitarian formula.
This oil is blessed by the bishop at the Mass of Chrism on Maundy Thursday.
http://www.stbrigids-kilbirnie.com/Pages/baptism.html   (1914 words)

  
 United Pentecostal Churches
The mode must be by immersion and the formula must be 'in Jesus' Name' only, not the Trinitarian formula of Matthew 28 which is 'in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit'.
The doctrinal views of the UPCI reflect most of the beliefs of the Holiness-Pentecostal movement, with the exception of the "second work of grace," the historic doctrine of the Trinity, and the traditional Trinitarian formula in water baptism.
It embraces the Pentecostal view that speaking in tongues is the initial sign of receiving the Holy Spirit.
http://www.gospelcenterchurch.org/upc.html   (2037 words)

  
 Unitarianism - Free Encyclopedia
Many Christians hold that a denial of the trinity and a subsequent lack of belief in the godhead of Jesus Christ is not a position tenable for Christians.
Unitarianism as a system of Christian thought and religious observance has its basis, as opposed to that of orthodox Trinitarianism, in the unipersonality of the Godhead, i.e.
Further, a baptism is not valid unless the trinitarian formula is used in its administration, Therefore many Christians regard Unitarianism as a non-Christian religion.
http://badpredictions.wacklepedia.com/u/un/unitarianism.html   (3790 words)

  
 apolo 65
"The Early Christians, when baptizing, made use of the Trinitarian formula, 'I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." Rev. Michael Kindelin, Christianity down through the ages, p.
"Indeed, if God were not a Trinity, then how is it that Christians have always baptized according to the Trinitarian formula "in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost," according to the very command of Jesus, unless they were a Trinity, three Divine Persons in one
"The Early Christians made use of the Trinitarian formula exclusively when baptizing...." Professor Joseph Whitman, The Early Church and the Bible, p.
http://www.catholicapologetics.net/apolo_65.htm   (3740 words)

  
 Marx, Capital, Volume III, Part VII, Chapter 48: Library of Economics and Liberty
Those means of production are then capital in themselves, by nature; capital is merely an "economic name" for those means of production; and in the same way land is then naturally the earth monopolized by a certain number of landlords.
The one, Capital, is a definite form of an element of production belonging to a definite mode of production having a definite cast.
This formula corresponds at the same time to the interests of the ruling classes, by proclaiming the natural necessity and eternal justification of their sources of revenue and raising them to the position of a dogma.
http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/YPDBooks/Marx/mrxCpC48.html   (5182 words)

  
 Talk:Baptism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I recognize that there are a few groups that do not baptize using the "trinitarian formula"; but even counting those exceptions this is the most universal of all practices in the various churches.
Baptism for Christians may have been instituted by Jesus Christ, but John the Baptist was baptizing first, leading to several possible interpretations of who "instituted" it.
Alright; but there is also the fact that for most of us, the difference between getting wet and getting baptised, resides in the Trinitarian formula.
http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baptism   (5516 words)

  
 Catholic News Agency
Parishioners baptized at St. Mary’s Parish in the Archdiocese of Brisbane in the last decade should contact the church and check whether or not the church actually recognizes their baptism, said Fr.
The "creator, liberator and sustainer" formula became popular among New Age- influenced Catholic communities, more interested in a broad Christian, rather than Catholic, identity.
According to Catholic teachings, only explicitly Trinitarian baptism — "in the name of the Father, and the Son and the Holy Spirit" — is valid.
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=2556   (609 words)

  
 Ad Limina Apostolorum
Thus the Godhead - in which the Father subsists as begetting the Son, the Son as begotten by the Father, and the Spirit as proceeding from both as the very embodiment of their reciprocal love - becomes the foundation for human interrelations, especially those within the human family (cf.
The Christian Tradition has always understood the Trinitarian hypostases not as arbitrary names, functions or roles, but rather as true persons in relation (East and West differ a bit here, but the difference does not touch on this matter).
Fr Kennedy said the words used by him and Fr Terry Fitzpatrick at St Mary's were not scripturally based but based on the doctrine of the trinity.
http://adlimina.blogspot.com/2004_11_01_adlimina_archive.html   (3879 words)

  
 If Any Man Hear My Voice
But Catholic missionaries, by omitting one or more persons of the Trinity when they were baptized, were anathematized by the Roman church.
At the time of the Reformation, the Protestant Church took over the doctrine of the Trinity without serious examination" (Vol.
Now the formula of Rome is, "I baptize thee in the name of the Father, and in the name of the Son and in the name of the Holy Ghost" (11th Ed., Vol.
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/proph04.htm   (2165 words)

  
 Baptism
It is one of two sacraments in the Protestant church, and baptism with water and the Holy Spirit that includes the traditional Trinitarian formula is recognized across denominations and divisions of the Christian family.
Baptism is God's gift, celebrated and sealed by our action.
http://www.nhcc.net/baptism.htm   (289 words)

  
 The Trinitarian Formula, The Wonder of Worship, Christ the King Lutheran Church
The Trinitarian Formula, The Wonder of Worship, Christ the King Lutheran Church
And we are stating that the Triune God is an objective reality even for those who do not know or believe.
The Rev. Edwin D. Peterman, Senior Pastor, Retired
http://www.ctkelc.org/worship/wonder1.htm   (565 words)

  
 Re: Trinitarian Formula was Re: Bishop Ilhoff on Accokeek
Previous by thread: Re: Drivel: Viola (was Bishop Ilhoff on Accokeek)
Subject: Re: Trinitarian Formula was Re: Bishop Ilhoff on Accokeek
Re: Trinitarian Formula was Re: Bishop Ilhoff on Accokeek
http://memoriam.anglicansonline.org/mutt/msg06268.html   (332 words)

 About us   |  Why use us?   |  Press   |  Contact us

 Copyright © 2006 Creedopedia.com Usage implies agreement with terms.